Before moving forward with strict regulations on police surveillance tools, experts suggest pausing to consider the broader implications and potential unintended consequences of hasty policy changes.
In the Rush to Regulate Police Surveillance, Slow Down
I worry about unintended consequences too, but transparency must come before blanket exemptions.
Who decides what’s ‘hasty’? Seems like a stalling tactic for civil liberties advocates.
Smart take. We need data, not panic-driven policies that leave officers blind to modern threats.