European leaders and space experts convened at the two-day International Space Summit in Paris on Wednesday, gathering officials, astronauts, researchers, and industry figures from approximately 120 countries. The summit marks a significant effort by Europe to assert greater independence in the global space sector, moving away from reliance on United States providers.
French President Emmanuel Macron emphasized the urgency of this shift in a statement posted on X, declaring that “Europe is taking its destiny into its own hands.” He urged innovation and investment to build a powerful, autonomous Europe, extending even to space capabilities.
Josef Aschbacher, head of the European Space Agency (ESA), outlined a €10-billion ($11.6-billion) investment roadmap over the next decade. Speaking to European ministers during a closed session, he posed a critical question: “Will we be passengers or pilots?” Aschbacher argued that without such investment, Europe risks remaining dependent on foreign players in the industry.
Highlighting the financial implications of inaction, Aschbacher noted that purchasing launch services for European astronauts from foreign providers would cost an estimated €5 billion over ten years, with most funds flowing to non-European industries. Furthermore, such dependence would require permission to operate beyond Europe’s control. He contrasted this with the alternative of investing in domestic capabilities, which would create European jobs, strengthen autonomy, and bolster negotiating power on the international stage.
French astronaut Thomas Pesquet supported the call for self-reliance, telling AFP that Europe cannot afford to remain on the sidelines. “We’re leaders in technology, we have universities, labs, companies, space agencies– we need to take matters into our own hands,” Pesquet said.
The push for sovereign space capabilities has accelerated since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which exposed vulnerabilities in communications infrastructure. The conflict highlighted how Elon Musk’s Starlink service became a critical asset for Kyiv but also a potential liability, particularly after reports emerged that Musk refused to allow the system to be used for attacks on a Russian naval base.
In response, the European Union is developing Iris2, a sovereign satellite constellation designed to provide secure communications across the 27-member bloc. However, the network is not expected to become fully operational until 2030. Compounding these concerns, US satellite imaging companies Planet Labs and Vantor recently withheld images of the Middle East during the Iran war, reportedly to prevent adversaries from targeting US allies.
While the United States currently dominates the sector through NASA’s Artemis program and commercial giants like SpaceX and Blue Origin, European ambitions are growing. A French presidential official acknowledged the tensions and technological competition, particularly with China, noting that while Europe has strengths, much more funding is required to keep pace.
Notably, SpaceX and Blue Origin canceled their participation in the Paris summit. The French government confirmed the cancellations, while Politico reported that the White House had urged US space companies not to attend, fearing it could be interpreted as support for EU policies aimed at reducing American dominance.
ESA member states are expected to discuss Aschbacher’s proposal at a ministerial meeting in December to determine the next steps toward sectoral autonomy.
The Ukraine situation really opened everyone’s eyes about relying on foreign tech. This investment isn’t just about prestige, it is about security.
Passengers or pilots—that metaphor really struck a chord. We have the talent; we just need the political will to spend the money.
It is rather telling that SpaceX and Blue Origin boycotted the summit. Seems like they are watching this closely.
Iris2 is vital, but 2030 feels like a lifetime away. Will we survive the next decade of vulnerability without a backup plan?
Finally, Europe is waking up to its strategic dependence. The €10 billion price tag is steep but arguably cheaper than the alternative.