The Guardian opinion piece by Helen Pilcher examines the parallel between linguistic erosion and societal complacency regarding climate change. The article opens with a personal anecdote from a coffee shop, where the author overheard a customer describe their toast as “awesome.” Rather than appreciating the breakfast, Pilcher feels a sense of loss, recalling a time when the term evoked genuine reverence for natural wonders such as mountain ranges, star-filled skies, or humpback whale songs.
This linguistic degradation is presented as a metaphor for a broader cultural failing. Just as “fantastic” has been stripped of its mythical origins to simply mean “great,” and “literally” is now often used to emphasize figurative statements, extreme weather events are being accepted as ordinary occurrences.
Pilcher contends that the true danger lies not just in the physical consequences of a warming planet—such as scorching summers, flooded streets, and failing crops—but in the psychological normalization of these disasters. The piece warns that humanity is suffering from a form of collective dithering, where unprecedented environmental deterioration is rebranded as “just another normal summer,” blinding us to the severity of the crisis.
I prefer ‘ridiculous’ for the weather now. ‘Awesome’ feels too polite for how weird this is getting.
Does normalizing the term actually change behavior, or is it just another intellectual exercise?
Exactly! We need to restore some awe for nature, not treat every disaster as background noise.
I worry this comparison minimizes actual climate catastrophe. Food and weather aren’t the same stakes.