An independent review has identified multiple security deficiencies at Utah Valley University (UVU) surrounding the event where conservative activist Charlie Kirk was fatally shot last year. The report, published by the university, indicates that UVU failed to conduct a proper written security assessment or prepare an event action plan, instead deferring critical decision-making to Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA.
Kirk, 31, was addressing a crowd of approximately 3,000 people in an Orem campus courtyard on September 10, 2025, when he was shot from a nearby rooftop. The review noted that Kirk’s aides insisted on holding the event outdoors despite concerns from university officials about the location being surrounded by tall buildings. Campus administrators had previously suggested indoor alternatives in August 2025, but a representative for Turning Point USA argued for the courtyard due to the organization’s familiarity with the venue.
External consultants highlighted that no line-of-sight assessment was documented despite “significant protective operations considerations.” The report also cited poor coordination between UVU police and Kirk’s private security team, noting that a proposed meeting between the university’s police chief and Turning Point security shortly before the event never occurred. Reviewers described the lack of a joint briefing and walk-through as a missed opportunity to identify risks and clarify responsibilities.
However, the review concluded that no university employee or representative acted in bad faith or demonstrated “willful and wanton disregard” for safety. Kirk’s family, which had previously filed a wrongful-death notice, stated the findings reinforced their concerns. Brett Parkinson, the family’s lawyer, told the Associated Press that the report validated their claims, stating, “The buck stopped with UVU leadership and law enforcement. Justice for Charlie and his family requires true accountability for UVU’s fatal shortcomings that day.”
Turning Point USA declined to comment directly, referring instead to Parkinson’s statement. UVU President Jon Anderson said the university must “learn from the findings of this review, and follow through on its recommendations,” which aim to improve security for future major campus events. It has been reported that campus police did not perform standard high-profile event procedures, such as drone surveillance of rooftops or security screening with metal detectors and bag checks.
Kirk was killed while debating students about US mass shootings. His alleged killer, Tyler Robinson, has pleaded not guilty to aggravated murder, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.
If no one acted in bad faith, how did this happen? This screams systemic negligence and leadership failure at every level.
It is terrifying that they held this outdoor event surrounded by tall buildings without a single line-of-sight assessment. What were they thinking?